Appeals
Fifth Circuit Affirms Judgment for DFW Airport in Qui Tam Lawsuit
Fifth Circuit Affirms Judgment for DFW Airport in Qui Tam Lawsuit
December 27, 2007 in Case Summaries
After serving as appellate counsel for the Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport Board during a three-week jury trial, Jeff Levinger was successful in persuading the Fifth Circuit to affirm the jury’s verdict that DFW did not violate the False Claims Act in submitting grant applications to the Federal Aviation Administration. The Fifth Circuit found no reversible error in connection with District Judge Barbara Lynn’s evidentiary rulings and jury instructions. United States ex rel. Heath v. Dallas-Fort Worth Int’l Airport Board, No. 06‑10958 (5th Cir. 2007).
Courts: Federal Courts of Appeals
Subject Matter: Securities Matters & Fraud; Business Litigation
$56 Million Judgment for Trademark Infringement Settled on Appeal
$56 Million Judgment for Trademark Infringement Settled on Appeal
August 31, 2007 in Case Summaries
Jeff Levinger represented NDS, a manufacturer of irrigation products, in the appeal of a $56 million judgment based on alleged trademark infringement. The case settled in mediation after oral argument. National Diversified Sales, Inc. v. DFW Plastics, Inc., No. 02-06-00231-CV (filed in the Fort Worth Court of Appeals).
Subject Matter: Intellectual Property
Rule 11 Settlement Agreement Enforced on Appeal
Rule 11 Settlement Agreement Enforced on Appeal
July 12, 2007 in Case Summaries
Jeff Levinger represented the investors in a surgery center in the appeal of the trial court’s determination that a Rule 11 settlement agreement was unenforceable. The Dallas Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the settlement agreement was enforceable. Disney Bingham Investments, Inc. v. Gollan, 233 S.W.3d 591 (Tex. App. – Dallas 2007, no pet.).
Subject Matter: Procedural & Evidentiary Issues
Dallas Court of Appeals Reverses Summary Judgment Against DART Contractor Based on Derivative Immunity Statute
Dallas Court of Appeals Reverses Summary Judgment Against DART Contractor Based on Derivative Immunity Statute
August 31, 2006 in Case Summaries
Jeff Levinger represented Martin K. Eby Construction Company in a successful appeal to reverse a summary judgment against Eby in its suit against LAN/STV, an architect and engineering firm. Eby sued LAN/STV for negligent misrepresentations contained in construction plans for a DART rail project running from the West End to the American Airlines Center in Dallas. The trial court granted summary judgment to LAN/STV based on a Texas statute providing immunity to certain independent contractors of governmental entities like DART. Although the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit had previously sided with LAN/STV in a separate appeal involving another contractor, the Dallas Court of Appeals agreed with Eby’s interpretation of the derivative immunity statute and held that LAN/STV would be liable in tort to Eby to the same extent that DART would be liable in contract to Eby. The court of appeals remanded the case for trial on the merits. Martin K. Eby Construction Co. v. LAN/STV, 205 S.W.3d 15 (Tex. App. — Dallas 2006, pet. denied).
Subject Matter: Business Litigation
Former Client Not Entitled to Reopen Bankruptcy Case Against Law Firm
Former Client Not Entitled to Reopen Bankruptcy Case Against Law Firm
July 19, 2006 in Case Summaries
Jeff Levinger represented a law firm in the appeal of a bankruptcy court order refusing the plaintiff’s request to reopen a bankruptcy case and to appoint a trustee. The Fifth Circuit affirmed. Industrial Clearinghouse, Inc. v. Jackson Walker, No. 05-10861 (5th Cir. 2006)
Subject Matter: Ethics & Professional Malpractice