Appeals

$56 Million Judgment for Trademark Infringement Settled on Appeal

$56 Million Judgment for Trademark Infringement Settled on Appeal

August 31, 2007 in Case Summaries

Jeff Levinger represented NDS, a manufacturer of irrigation products, in the appeal of a $56 million judgment based on alleged trademark infringement.  The case settled in mediation after oral argument. National Diversified Sales, Inc. v. DFW Plastics, Inc., No. 02-06-00231-CV (filed in the Fort Worth Court of Appeals).

Courts: Texas Intermediate Appellate Courts
Subject Matter: Intellectual Property
Comments Off on $56 Million Judgment for Trademark Infringement Settled on Appeal

Rule 11 Settlement Agreement Enforced on Appeal

Rule 11 Settlement Agreement Enforced on Appeal

July 12, 2007 in Case Summaries

Jeff Levinger represented the investors in a surgery center in the appeal of the trial court’s determination that a Rule 11 settlement agreement was unenforceable.  The Dallas Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the settlement agreement was enforceable.  Disney Bingham Investments, Inc. v. Gollan, 233 S.W.3d 591 (Tex. App. – Dallas 2007, no pet.).

Courts: Texas Intermediate Appellate Courts
Subject Matter: Procedural & Evidentiary Issues
Comments Off on Rule 11 Settlement Agreement Enforced on Appeal

Dallas Court of Appeals Reverses Summary Judgment Against DART Contractor Based on Derivative Immunity Statute

Dallas Court of Appeals Reverses Summary Judgment Against DART Contractor Based on Derivative Immunity Statute

August 31, 2006 in Case Summaries

Jeff Levinger represented Martin K. Eby Construction Company in a successful appeal
to reverse a summary judgment against Eby in its suit against LAN/STV, an architect and engineering firm.  Eby sued LAN/STV for negligent misrepresentations contained in construction plans for a DART rail project running from the West End to the American Airlines Center in Dallas.  The trial court granted summary judgment to LAN/STV based on a Texas statute providing immunity to certain independent contractors of  governmental entities like DART.  Although the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit had previously sided with LAN/STV in a separate appeal involving another contractor, the Dallas Court of Appeals agreed with Eby’s interpretation of the derivative immunity statute and held that LAN/STV would be liable in tort to Eby to the same extent that DART would be liable in contract to Eby.  The court of appeals remanded the case for trial on the merits. Martin K. Eby Construction Co. v. LAN/STV, 205 S.W.3d 15 (Tex. App. — Dallas  2006, pet. denied).

Courts: Supreme Court of Texas, Texas Intermediate Appellate Courts
Subject Matter: Business Litigation
Comments Off on Dallas Court of Appeals Reverses Summary Judgment Against DART Contractor Based on Derivative Immunity Statute

Former Client Not Entitled to Reopen Bankruptcy Case Against Law Firm

Former Client Not Entitled to Reopen Bankruptcy Case Against Law Firm

July 19, 2006 in Case Summaries

Jeff Levinger represented a law firm in the appeal of a bankruptcy court order refusing the plaintiff’s request to reopen a bankruptcy case and to appoint a trustee. The Fifth Circuit affirmed. Industrial Clearinghouse, Inc. v. Jackson Walker, No. 05-10861 (5th Cir. 2006)

Courts: Federal Courts of Appeals
Subject Matter: Ethics & Professional Malpractice
Comments Off on Former Client Not Entitled to Reopen Bankruptcy Case Against Law Firm

Take-Nothing Judgment Affirmed Based on Res Judicata

Take-Nothing Judgment Affirmed Based on Res Judicata

April 21, 2006 in Case Summaries

Jeff Levinger represented Michael Cohen in the appeal of a take-nothing judgment in his favor based on res judicata.  The Dallas Court of Appeals affirmed.  Frazin v. Cohen, No. 05-03-01706-CV (Tex. App.  – Dallas 2005, pet. denied) (unpublished opinion).

Courts: Texas Intermediate Appellate Courts
Subject Matter: Procedural & Evidentiary Issues
Comments Off on Take-Nothing Judgment Affirmed Based on Res Judicata