Multi-Million Dollar Judgment for Breach of Fiduciary Duty Reversed Based on Contractual Disclaimer.

Multi-Million Dollar Judgment for Breach of Fiduciary Duty Reversed Based on Contractual Disclaimer.

January 12, 2012 in Case Summaries

In a complex partnership dispute that culminated in a multi-million dollar jury verdict, Jeff Levinger persuaded the Houston First Court of Appeals to reverse the judgment against his client, Douglas Strebel.  Strebel’s former partner, John Wimberly, had obtained a $3.4 million judgment  based on the jury’s findings that Strebel had breached alleged fiduciary duties as both the controlling member of a Delaware LLC and the limited partner of a Texas LP.  The court of appeals reversed, holding that Wimberly’s alleged loss of distributions occurred only at the LP level where the parties had contractually disclaimed any fiduciary duties on the part of the general partner and the controlling member of the general partner.  Strebel v. Wimberly, 371 S.W.3d 267 (Tex. App. ‑‑ Houston [1st Dist.] 2012, pet. denied).

Courts: Supreme Court of Texas, Texas Intermediate Appellate Courts
Subject Matter:  Business Litigation

By | January 12th, 2012|Comments Off on Multi-Million Dollar Judgment for Breach of Fiduciary Duty Reversed Based on Contractual Disclaimer.

Dallas Court of Appeals Rules Again for DART Contractor, Supreme Court Applies Economic Loss Rule

Dallas Court of Appeals Rules Again for DART Contractor in Dispute Against Architect

August 29, 2011 in Case Summaries

In a second appeal involving the same lawsuit, Jeff Levinger again successfully represented Martin K. Eby Construction Company in its negligent misrepresentation suit against LAN/STV, an architect and engineer that prepared faulty construction plans and drawings for an extension of the DART rail project.  Following the remand in the first appeal, Eby settled its administrative claim against DART for $4.7  million and proceeded to trial against LAN/STV.  The jury found that LAN/STV had committed negligent misrepresentations that caused Eby $5 million in damages, but the trial court reduced the award to $2,250,000 plus interest based on the jury’s additional finding that LAN/STV was 45% responsible.  On appeal, the Dallas Court of Appeals rejected LAN/STV’s arguments regarding the derivative governmental immunity statute, the economic loss doctrine, the evidence of negligent misrepresentations, and the effect of the DART settlement.  The Texas Supreme Court subsequently reversed, holding that the economic loss rule restricted Eby to a breach of contact claim against DART.  Martin K. Eby Construction Co. v. LAN/STV, 350 S.W. 3d 675 (Tex. App. — Dallas Aug. 29, 2011), rev’d, 435 S.W. 30 234(Tex.2014).

Courts: Supreme Court of Texas,  Texas Intermediate Appellate Courts
Subject Matter: Business Litigation, Procedural & Evidentiary Issues

By | August 29th, 2011|Comments Off on Dallas Court of Appeals Rules Again for DART Contractor, Supreme Court Applies Economic Loss Rule

In Landmark Rulings, Appellate Courts Define the Law on Shareholder Oppression and Stock Buy-Back Remedy

Court of Appeals Upholds Finding of Shareholder Oppression and Stock Buy-Back Remedy

March 28, 2011 in Case Summaries

In a closely-watched case involving shareholder oppression, the Dallas Court of Appeals upheld a judgment in favor of Levinger PC client Ann Rupe based on the jury’s finding that she had been oppressed by the officers and directors of Rupe Investment Corporation when they refused her request to meet with potential purchasers of her stock.  The appellate court also upheld the trial court’s order requiring the defendants to buy back Ms. Rupe’s stock as an equitable remedy for their misconduct. In a landmark ruling that redefined the text of shareholder oppression in Texas, the Supreme Court held that the conduct at issue did not satisfy the new definition of oppression, but remanded the case for further analysis of Ms. Rupe’s fiduciary duty claim. Ms. Rupe was represented at trial by Steve Aldous and Charla Aldous.  Ritchie v. Rupe, as Trustee for the Dallas Gordon Rupe, III 1995 Family Trust, 339 S.W.3d 275 (Tex. App. — Dallas), rev’d in part, 443 S.W. 30 856 (Tex.2014).

Courts: Supreme Court of Texas, Texas Intermediate Appellate Courts
Subject Matter: Business Litigation
By | March 28th, 2011|Comments Off on In Landmark Rulings, Appellate Courts Define the Law on Shareholder Oppression and Stock Buy-Back Remedy

Take-Nothing Summary Judgment Affirmed on Claims Arising from Operation of Traffic Signal Enforcement System

Take-Nothing Summary Judgment Affirmed on Claims Arising from Operation of Traffic Signal Enforcement System

November 16, 2010 in Case Summaries

Jeff Levinger represented ACS State and Local Solutions, Inc., a corporation that provides traffic signal enforcement systems to municipalities, in the appeal of a take-nothing summary judgment in its favor. The plaintiff had been cited for a red-light violation, and brought claims against ACS for purported violations of the Texas Debt Collection Act and negligence per se based on alleged violations of the Texas Occupations Code and the Texas Transportation Code. The Dallas Court of Appeals affirmed the summary judgment in favor of ACS on all grounds. Amanda Ward v. ACS State and Local Solutions, Inc., d/b/a LDC Collection Systems, 328 S.W.3d 648 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2010, no pet.).

Courts: Texas Intermediate Appellate Courts
Subject Matter: Business Litigation
By | November 16th, 2010|Comments Off on Take-Nothing Summary Judgment Affirmed on Claims Arising from Operation of Traffic Signal Enforcement System

Levinger Speaks to Texas State Court Judges about the Texas Supreme Court’s Trends, Statistics, and Cases

Levinger Speaks to Texas State Court Judges about the Texas Supreme Court’s Trends, Statistics, and Cases

September 24, 2010 in Speeches
Using a power point presentation, Jeff Levinger presented an update on the 2009-2010 Texas Supreme Court to over 200 state court judges at the 2010 annual judicial education conference in Corpus Christi.  Levinger first presented trends and statistics of the Court.  He then summarized 40 cases in 14 different subject matter areas.  Levinger concluded the hour-long presentation by highlighting twelve cases that are currently awaiting decision by the Court.

Subject Matter: Business Litigation
By | September 24th, 2010|Comments Off on Levinger Speaks to Texas State Court Judges about the Texas Supreme Court’s Trends, Statistics, and Cases