In Landmark Rulings, Appellate Courts Define the Law on Shareholder Oppression and Stock Buy-Back Remedy

Court of Appeals Upholds Finding of Shareholder Oppression and Stock Buy-Back Remedy

March 28, 2011 in Case Summaries

In a closely-watched case involving shareholder oppression, the Dallas Court of Appeals upheld a judgment in favor of Levinger PC client Ann Rupe based on the jury’s finding that she had been oppressed by the officers and directors of Rupe Investment Corporation when they refused her request to meet with potential purchasers of her stock.  The appellate court also upheld the trial court’s order requiring the defendants to buy back Ms. Rupe’s stock as an equitable remedy for their misconduct. In a landmark ruling that redefined the text of shareholder oppression in Texas, the Supreme Court held that the conduct at issue did not satisfy the new definition of oppression, but remanded the case for further analysis of Ms. Rupe’s fiduciary duty claim. Ms. Rupe was represented at trial by Steve Aldous and Charla Aldous.  Ritchie v. Rupe, as Trustee for the Dallas Gordon Rupe, III 1995 Family Trust, 339 S.W.3d 275 (Tex. App. — Dallas), rev’d in part, 443 S.W. 30 856 (Tex.2014).

Courts: Supreme Court of Texas, Texas Intermediate Appellate Courts
Subject Matter: Business Litigation
By | March 28th, 2011|Comments Off on In Landmark Rulings, Appellate Courts Define the Law on Shareholder Oppression and Stock Buy-Back Remedy

Take-Nothing Summary Judgment Affirmed on Claims Arising from Operation of Traffic Signal Enforcement System

Take-Nothing Summary Judgment Affirmed on Claims Arising from Operation of Traffic Signal Enforcement System

November 16, 2010 in Case Summaries

Jeff Levinger represented ACS State and Local Solutions, Inc., a corporation that provides traffic signal enforcement systems to municipalities, in the appeal of a take-nothing summary judgment in its favor. The plaintiff had been cited for a red-light violation, and brought claims against ACS for purported violations of the Texas Debt Collection Act and negligence per se based on alleged violations of the Texas Occupations Code and the Texas Transportation Code. The Dallas Court of Appeals affirmed the summary judgment in favor of ACS on all grounds. Amanda Ward v. ACS State and Local Solutions, Inc., d/b/a LDC Collection Systems, 328 S.W.3d 648 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2010, no pet.).

Courts: Texas Intermediate Appellate Courts
Subject Matter: Business Litigation
By | November 16th, 2010|Comments Off on Take-Nothing Summary Judgment Affirmed on Claims Arising from Operation of Traffic Signal Enforcement System

Levinger Speaks to Texas State Court Judges about the Texas Supreme Court’s Trends, Statistics, and Cases

Levinger Speaks to Texas State Court Judges about the Texas Supreme Court’s Trends, Statistics, and Cases

September 24, 2010 in Speeches
Using a power point presentation, Jeff Levinger presented an update on the 2009-2010 Texas Supreme Court to over 200 state court judges at the 2010 annual judicial education conference in Corpus Christi.  Levinger first presented trends and statistics of the Court.  He then summarized 40 cases in 14 different subject matter areas.  Levinger concluded the hour-long presentation by highlighting twelve cases that are currently awaiting decision by the Court.

Subject Matter: Business Litigation
By | September 24th, 2010|Comments Off on Levinger Speaks to Texas State Court Judges about the Texas Supreme Court’s Trends, Statistics, and Cases

Judgment on Breach of Contract and Misappropriation of Trade Secret Claims Reversed and Rendered on Appeal, and Judgment in Favor of Counterclaimant Affirmed

Judgment on Breach of Contract and Misappropriation of Trade Secret Claims Reversed and Rendered on Appeal, and Judgment in Favor of Counterclaimant Affirmed

March 8, 2010 in Case Summaries

Jeff Levinger represented defendant/counter-plaintiff Impact Equity and its two owners in their appeal of judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff for breach of a confidentiality agreement and misappropriation of trade secrets and in the plaintiff’s cross-appeal of a judgment rendered in Impact Equity’s favor on a claim for breach of a fee agreement. The Dallas Court affirmed the judgment in favor of Impact Equity on its breach of contract claim and reversed and rendered judgment that the plaintiff take nothing on its claims. Calce v. Dorado Exploration, Inc., 309 S.W.3d 719 (Tex. App.–Dallas 2010, no pet.).

Courts: Texas Intermediate Appellate Courts
Subject Matter: Business Litigation, Intellectual Property
By | March 8th, 2010|Comments Off on Judgment on Breach of Contract and Misappropriation of Trade Secret Claims Reversed and Rendered on Appeal, and Judgment in Favor of Counterclaimant Affirmed

$61 Million Judgment for Breach of Bond Indenture Reversed and Rendered on Appeal

$61 Million Judgment for Breach of Bond Indenture Reversed and Rendered on Appeal

January 15, 2010 in Case Summaries

Jeff Levinger represented Sears, Roebuck and Co. in the appeal of a $61 million judgment based on a jury verdict that Sears breached a bond indenture by prematurely redeeming corporate bonds held by a number of institutional investors. The Dallas Court of Appeals sustained Sears’ no evidence challenge because the investors failed to present any evidence of breach, and thus reversed and rendered a take-nothing judgment against the investors. After Sears responded to the investors’ petition for review, the Texas Supreme Court denied the petition. Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. AIG Annuity Ins. Co., 270 S.W.3d 632 (Tex. App.–Dallas 2008, pet. denied).

Courts: Supreme Court of Texas, Texas Intermediate Appellate Courts
Subject Matter: Business Litigation, Intellectual Property
By | January 15th, 2010|Comments Off on $61 Million Judgment for Breach of Bond Indenture Reversed and Rendered on Appeal