Dallas Court of Appeals Reverses Summary Judgment Against DART Contractor Based on Derivative Immunity Statute

Dallas Court of Appeals Reverses Summary Judgment Against DART Contractor Based on Derivative Immunity Statute

August 31, 2006 in Case Summaries

Jeff Levinger represented Martin K. Eby Construction Company in a successful appeal
to reverse a summary judgment against Eby in its suit against LAN/STV, an architect and engineering firm.  Eby sued LAN/STV for negligent misrepresentations contained in construction plans for a DART rail project running from the West End to the American Airlines Center in Dallas.  The trial court granted summary judgment to LAN/STV based on a Texas statute providing immunity to certain independent contractors of  governmental entities like DART.  Although the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit had previously sided with LAN/STV in a separate appeal involving another contractor, the Dallas Court of Appeals agreed with Eby’s interpretation of the derivative immunity statute and held that LAN/STV would be liable in tort to Eby to the same extent that DART would be liable in contract to Eby.  The court of appeals remanded the case for trial on the merits. Martin K. Eby Construction Co. v. LAN/STV, 205 S.W.3d 15 (Tex. App. — Dallas  2006, pet. denied).

Courts: Supreme Court of Texas, Texas Intermediate Appellate Courts
Subject Matter: Business Litigation
By | August 31st, 2006|Comments Off on Dallas Court of Appeals Reverses Summary Judgment Against DART Contractor Based on Derivative Immunity Statute

Take-Nothing Judgment Affirmed Based on Res Judicata

Take-Nothing Judgment Affirmed Based on Res Judicata

April 21, 2006 in Case Summaries

Jeff Levinger represented Michael Cohen in the appeal of a take-nothing judgment in his favor based on res judicata.  The Dallas Court of Appeals affirmed.  Frazin v. Cohen, No. 05-03-01706-CV (Tex. App.  – Dallas 2005, pet. denied) (unpublished opinion).

Courts: Texas Intermediate Appellate Courts
Subject Matter: Procedural & Evidentiary Issues
By | April 21st, 2006|Comments Off on Take-Nothing Judgment Affirmed Based on Res Judicata

Summary Judgment in Legal Malpractice Case Affirmed on Appeal

Summary Judgment in Legal Malpractice Case Affirmed on Appeal

December 2, 2005 in Case Summaries

Jeff Levinger represented a law firm in the appeal of a take-nothing summary judgment in its favor in a legal malpractice suit based on a complex bankruptcy transaction. The Dallas Court of Appeals affirmed. Industrial Clearinghouse, Inc. v. Jackson Walker, 05-03-01752-CV (Tex. App-Dallas 2005, pet. denied).

Courts: Texas Intermediate Appellate Courts
Subject Matter: Ethics & Professional Malpractice
By | December 2nd, 2005|Comments Off on Summary Judgment in Legal Malpractice Case Affirmed on Appeal

Take-Nothing Judgment in Legal Malpractice Case Affirmed on Appeal

Take-Nothing Judgment in Legal Malpractice Case Affirmed on Appeal

July 27, 2005 in Case Summaries

Jeff Levinger represented a law firm in the appeal of a take-nothing summary judgment in a legal malpractice suit based on the plaintiff’s failure to prove actual damages. The Dallas Court of Appeals affirmed the take-nothing judgment. El Dorado Motors, Inc. v. Vial Hamilton Koch & Knox, 168 S.W. 3d 360 (Tex. App.- Dallas 2005, no pet.).

Courts: Texas Intermediate Appellate Courts
Subject Matter: Ethics & Professional Malpractice

By | July 27th, 2005|Comments Off on Take-Nothing Judgment in Legal Malpractice Case Affirmed on Appeal

Texas Supreme Court Rejects Fraud and Fiduciary Duty Claims Against Developer

Texas Supreme Court Rejects Fraud and Fiduciary Duty Claims Against Developer

June 24, 2005 in Case Summaries

Jeff Levinger represented a Texas real estate developer in an appeal from a JNOV dismissing claims of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty brought by a former employee.  The Waco Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part, but the Texas Supreme Court reversed and rendered a take-nothing judgment in favor of the developer.  Cathey v. Meyer, 115 S.W.3d 694 (Tex. App. — Waco 2003), rev’d, 167 S.W.3d 327 (Tex. 2005).

Courts: Supreme Court of Texas,  Texas Intermediate Appellate Courts
Subject Matter: Oil & Gas/Real Estate, Securities Matters & Fraud
By | June 24th, 2005|Comments Off on Texas Supreme Court Rejects Fraud and Fiduciary Duty Claims Against Developer