Texas Intermediate Appellate Courts

Take-Nothing Summary Judgment Affirmed on Claims Arising from Operation of Traffic Signal Enforcement System

Take-Nothing Summary Judgment Affirmed on Claims Arising from Operation of Traffic Signal Enforcement System

November 16, 2010 in Case Summaries

Jeff Levinger represented ACS State and Local Solutions, Inc., a corporation that provides traffic signal enforcement systems to municipalities, in the appeal of a take-nothing summary judgment in its favor. The plaintiff had been cited for a red-light violation, and brought claims against ACS for purported violations of the Texas Debt Collection Act and negligence per se based on alleged violations of the Texas Occupations Code and the Texas Transportation Code. The Dallas Court of Appeals affirmed the summary judgment in favor of ACS on all grounds. Amanda Ward v. ACS State and Local Solutions, Inc., d/b/a LDC Collection Systems, 328 S.W.3d 648 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2010, no pet.).

Courts: Texas Intermediate Appellate Courts
Subject Matter: Business Litigation
Comments Off on Take-Nothing Summary Judgment Affirmed on Claims Arising from Operation of Traffic Signal Enforcement System

Fraud Judgment Reversed and Rendered on Appeal

Fraud Judgment Reversed and Rendered on Appeal

August 27, 2010 in Case Summaries

Jeff Levinger represented defendant Peter Gottlieb in an appeal of a judgment awarding the plaintiff $233,000 in actual damages and $466,000 in exemplary damages for fraud after a multi-week jury trial. The Dallas Court of Appeals denied the plaintiff’s appeal seeking additional damages, concluded that there was no evidence to support the jury’s fraud finding against Gottlieb, and reversed the trial court’s judgment and rendered judgment that the plaintiff take nothing from Gottlieb. Cerullo v. Gottlieb, 309 S.W.3d 160 (Tex. App.–Dallas 2010, pet. denied).

Courts: Texas Intermediate Appellate Courts
Subject Matter: Securities Matters & Fraud
Comments Off on Fraud Judgment Reversed and Rendered on Appeal

Judgment Allowing Judicial Foreclosure Affirmed on Appeal

Judgment Allowing Judicial Foreclosure Affirmed on Appeal

July 1, 2010 in Case Summaries

Jeff Levinger represented plaintiff LPP Mortgage in the defendants’ appeal of a judgment for judicial foreclosure following a bench trial.  The Austin Court of Appeals held that LPP Mortgage’s suit for foreclosure was not barred by res judicata, waiver, or the Texas statute of limitations, and thus affirmed the trial court’s judgment in favor of LPP.  Stephens v. LPP Mortgage, Ltd., 316 S.W.3d 742,  (Tex. App.–Austin 2010, pet. denied).

Courts: Texas Intermediate Appellate Courts
Subject Matter: Oil & Gas/Real Estate, Procedural & Evidentiary Issues
Comments Off on Judgment Allowing Judicial Foreclosure Affirmed on Appeal

Judgment on Breach of Contract and Misappropriation of Trade Secret Claims Reversed and Rendered on Appeal, and Judgment in Favor of Counterclaimant Affirmed

Judgment on Breach of Contract and Misappropriation of Trade Secret Claims Reversed and Rendered on Appeal, and Judgment in Favor of Counterclaimant Affirmed

March 8, 2010 in Case Summaries

Jeff Levinger represented defendant/counter-plaintiff Impact Equity and its two owners in their appeal of judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff for breach of a confidentiality agreement and misappropriation of trade secrets and in the plaintiff’s cross-appeal of a judgment rendered in Impact Equity’s favor on a claim for breach of a fee agreement. The Dallas Court affirmed the judgment in favor of Impact Equity on its breach of contract claim and reversed and rendered judgment that the plaintiff take nothing on its claims. Calce v. Dorado Exploration, Inc., 309 S.W.3d 719 (Tex. App.–Dallas 2010, no pet.).

Courts: Texas Intermediate Appellate Courts
Subject Matter: Business Litigation, Intellectual Property
Comments Off on Judgment on Breach of Contract and Misappropriation of Trade Secret Claims Reversed and Rendered on Appeal, and Judgment in Favor of Counterclaimant Affirmed

$61 Million Judgment for Breach of Bond Indenture Reversed and Rendered on Appeal

$61 Million Judgment for Breach of Bond Indenture Reversed and Rendered on Appeal

January 15, 2010 in Case Summaries

Jeff Levinger represented Sears, Roebuck and Co. in the appeal of a $61 million judgment based on a jury verdict that Sears breached a bond indenture by prematurely redeeming corporate bonds held by a number of institutional investors. The Dallas Court of Appeals sustained Sears’ no evidence challenge because the investors failed to present any evidence of breach, and thus reversed and rendered a take-nothing judgment against the investors. After Sears responded to the investors’ petition for review, the Texas Supreme Court denied the petition. Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. AIG Annuity Ins. Co., 270 S.W.3d 632 (Tex. App.–Dallas 2008, pet. denied).

Courts: Supreme Court of Texas, Texas Intermediate Appellate Courts
Subject Matter: Business Litigation, Intellectual Property
Comments Off on $61 Million Judgment for Breach of Bond Indenture Reversed and Rendered on Appeal